We used a litter bag technique to compare root and rhizome decay of Spartina
alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus along an elevational/tidal gradient
(Fig. 1)
including low marsh (intermediate height-form S. alterniflora),
mid marsh (short height-form S. alterniflora), and high marsh (J.
roemerianus) locations. Experiments were carried out in the marsh
surrounding the upper portion of Phillips Creek which drains into the coastal
lagoon complex of the Virginia Coast Reserve. The marsh is located
behind a relict sand ridge, and the surrounding uplands are either farm lands
or pine-forest wood lots. The distribution of plants in Phillips Creek marsh
is very patchy: Spartina alterniflora is the dominant plant species near
the regularly flooded low marsh (intermediate form) and in the occasionally flooded
mid marsh (short form) while large patches of Juncus roemerianus are dominant
in the infrequently flooded high marsh areas. Transects were established along
level contours in the low, mid, and high marsh areas. Litter bags containing dead
roots and rhizomes of either S. alterniflora or J. roemerianus were inserted
vertically into the sediments at 30 cm intervals along the transects. Over
1000 litter bags were placed in the marsh on February 6, 1991.
Nylon litter bags (1 x 2 mm opening) were filled in 10-cm sections with 12 g (wet weight) of dead roots and rhizomes per section. After filling, each section was sewn closed to separate it from the adjacent section so that the vertical distribution of decomposition and root growth could be examined. Three bags of each root litter type were randomly selected for sampling from each marsh area. Bags were collected approximately every two months and returned to the laboratory where live roots and rhizomes were sorted from the dead material. All organic materials were dried at 80 degrees C. Live and dead roots were handled separately. The rate of litter decay was measured as ash-free dry weight (AFDW) loss over time. Root productivity was calculated as the difference between the minimum and maximum amount of live root material in the bags during a growing season. Pore water sippers installed at 5 and 15 cm depths in the sediments were used to sample sediment pore water. Salinity and pH, and the concentrations of NH4+, PO43-, and H2S of the pore water were also monitored in the low, mid, and high marsh areas.
Little difference in weight loss was observed between the mid marsh and high marsh locations, but weight loss at the low marsh location may be more rapid than at the two interior locations. Decay constants (k) were calculated using an arithmetic and an exponential model for decay (Table 1). The significantly greater values of k for Juncus are consistent with the difference in the starting C/N ratios for the two plant materials (37:1 and 47:1; Juncus and Spartina respectively).
Root growth was highly variable, especially for the low and high marsh locations where the total amount of live roots in the litter bags did not exceed 300 g AFDW m-2. Root growth was much greater and less variable in the mid marsh location than near the creek or in the high marsh (900 g AFDW m-2).
Aboveground plant standing stocks were greatest in the low and high marsh areas as compared to the mid marsh location. However, total plant biomass (above- and belowground) was significantly greater in the mid marsh because short-form Spartina root growth was significantly greater than root growth of either intermediate height-form Spartina or Juncus.
Sediment pore water chemical properties were very different among marsh locations: mid marsh pore water salinities were lower on average than those for the low and high marsh while NH4+ and H2S concentrations were consistently greater than those for the low and high marsh.
Based on one year of data from an ongoing 5-year experiment we can conclude that:
Table 1. Decay constants and percent AFDW remaining after one year of decay. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Arithmetic Exponential ______________ ______________ Root Type Depth % REMAIN. in Location (cm) k r2 k r2 1 YEAR ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sa in Low 0-10 -0.10092 0.77 -0.00128 0.77 59.0 10-20 -0.09689 0.65 -0.00122 0.65 60.8 Jr in Low 0-10 -0.09383 0.66 -0.00168 0.71 59.4 10-20 -0.12589 0.83 -0.00196 0.85 59.5 Sa in Mid 0-10 -0.09781 0.89 -0.00117 0.88 68.6 10-20 -0.09003 0.81 -0.00107 0.81 69.7 Jr in Mid 0-10 -0.1256 0.75 -0.00164 0.71 64.7 10-20 -0.1442 0.99 -0.00194 0.99 53.2 Sa in High 0-10 -0.07944 0.83 -0.00112 0.82 71.3 10-20 -0.07411 0.91 -0.00103 0.67 74.3 Jr in High 0-10 -0.05760 0.18 -0.00118 0.32 67.5 10-20 -0.06970 0.34 -0.00119 0.31 65.1 Sa in Pruned 0-10 -0.06996 0.76 -0.00082 0.78 70.9 Low 10-20 -0.08514 0.72 -0.00101 0.70 67.5 Jr in Pruned 0-10 -0.13630 0.96 -0.00248 0.96 45.9 High 10-20 -0.15103 0.71 -0.00208 0.85 52.9 Dried Sa in 0-10 -0.11172 0.85 -0.00145 0.82 60.1 Low 10-20 -0.11382 0.86 -0.00141 0.85 62.2 Dried Jr in 0-10 -0.14630 0.76 -0.00194 0.65 53.7 High 10-20 -0.11870 0.72 -0.00200 0.78 56.6 Sa in Low 0-10 -0.12906 0.90 -0.00163 0.88 59.7 Perched Marsh 10-20 -0.10744 0.89 -0.00135 0.91 63.2 Sa in Low 0-10 -0.06656 0.26 -0.00081 0.20 78.8 Island Marsh 10-20 -0.11973 0.72 -0.00162 0.68 50.1 -----------------------------------------------------------------